Showing posts with label book contests. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book contests. Show all posts

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Some Thoughts about Poetry Book Contests

Entering poetry book contests often seems like a necessity if you want to get your manuscript published. But what an insidious process it can be. Not to mention expensive. And time-consuming. Before my first book came out in 2003, over a period of maybe six years, I entered the manuscript in dozens of contests. I spent several weeks each summer weeding out the weaker poems and substituting with what I hoped were stronger ones. I reconsidered the order of the poems. I redid the page numbering and the Table of Contests. I wrote out the checks. Then I waited months for notification.

The first time I received a semi-finalist spot was thrilling, more so the first time I received a finalist spot. But by the time I'd accumulated six of these close calls, it was getting stale. I felt stuck in place, always writing poems that could go into that book, unable to move onto the next book. Then I got lucky and found a home for my book, no contest involved. Since then my publisher has stuck with me for the following book and the forthcoming one for which I am hugely grateful. What a relief not to have to do the contest thing.

But recently I saw the process from the other side of the fence, i.e., I served as a first reader in a book contest. After reading through the pile of manuscripts, I put together some thoughts that perhaps someone out there might find useful before pulling out the next roll of stamps and the next batch of checks.

1. Do not overload the manuscript with poems. Too many is too many. I read one manuscript that had close to 100 poems! Now come on. The poet had simply failed to edit his own manuscript. Nor had he followed instructions in regards to number of pages. A collection that long has virtually no chance of being accepted anywhere.

2. I'd always heard that it was essential to have a strong first section. True! A weak first section discourages the reader from moving onto the second section. Weak first section and your goose is cooked.

3. After getting a really strong first section, make sure that the following sections are equally strong. You cannot get away with a weak section. Anywhere.

4. Be mindful of variety. This applies to subject, form, length. Too much sameness leads to boredom.

5. Work really hard on arranging the order of the poems. For many poets this is the most difficult part of putting together a manuscript. That's what friends are for. Ask a few poets whose judgment you trust to read the manuscript for order. Avoid the inclination to group similar poems together. Again, too much sameness leads to boredom. You want some kind of thread or threads running throughout, pleasing leaps from one poem to the next, surprises, and connections. Poor order was one of the main weaknesses in the manuscripts I read. You want a collection of poems, not a bunch of poems.

6. Here's another thing that separated the good from the not so hot: Diction, diction, diction. Why use boring words when there are so many good ones available? The language in the strong manuscripts immediately distinguished those collections.

7. Avoid excess baggage, e.g., accessorizing sections with numbers, plus titles, plus introductory poems, plus epigraphs. Keep it simple.

8. Don't go too highbrow with a bunch of unnecessary End Notes. Don't be pretentious. Nobody likes a stuffed shirt. If the information in the End Notes is essential, maybe it should be in the poem? or on the same page as the poem? I'm not saving never; I'm saying consider carefully the necessity. Likewise, avoid a bunch of ridiculous dedications of individual poems. I dedicate this one to Emily Dickinson, this one to my plumber, etc.

9. Remember that competence is not enough. The collection must stand out. The strong ones had something that was unique, that was special, that made them different from the others.

10. Good looks matter. Make sure your manuscript has a professional appearance. I was surprised to see manuscripts with the title uncentered, with dreadful fonts, with blurry pages. Don't crowd the pages, please! And please, in your Table of Contents, do not insert a hideous line of periods between title and page number.

Now here's the good news: If you have a good manuscript, you have a really good chance of winning. Don't send it out before it's ready, but when it's really ready, believe in it and send it out.







Friday, August 29, 2008

The Happy Ending

A bouquet for Stacey Lynn Brown

There's a happy ending to Stacey Lynn Brown's book publication nightmare. This is just the ending I and so many others wanted for her. Another publisher has picked up her collection! Cradle Song will be published in January 2009 by C&R Press, a new press started by director Ryan G. Van Cleave and editor Chad Prevost. Although the press has only one title under its belt so far, I know Stacey is in very good hands. These are two very reputable poets.

C&R's first book is Michelle Bitting's Good Friday Kiss, winner of the 2007 De Novo Award, a contest judged by Thomas Lux. This book is available at the website. There is also an anthology, Breathe: 101 Contemporary Odes, coming soon. Also scheduled is the 2007 Open Series winner, Jon Veinberg's The Speed Limit of Clouds.

Submissions for the 2008 DeNova first book contest are being taken as are submissions for the open series. Guidelines are posted at the website. Note that the deadline for the De Novo contest is October 1. Deadline for the Open Series is November 29. The open series requires a reading fee of $20. Both contests give entrants a copy of a winning book as long as an SASE is included. I like it when you get something for your money.

Van Cleave is sticking to Stacey's original publication date of January 2009 so that she can proceed with already scheduled readings and other events. How nice and accommodating is that?

Sometimes things really do work out as they should.


Bookmark and Share
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...